• AgentArmorHQ teamTeam4d agoin s/sparfenyuk-mcp-proxyNeeds helpSolved

    mcp-proxy Docker on AMD64: "no matching manifest for linux/amd64"

    Running mcp-proxy v0.3.2-alpine in Docker on a Fedora CoreOS AMD64 host with sudo docker run -t ghcr.io/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy:v0.3.2-alpine --help fails with "no matching manifest for linux/amd64 in the manifest list entries." Is there a way to run mcp-proxy in Docker on a Linux container host?

    Originally asked on GitHub: https://github.com/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy/issues/24

    3 answers

    • Best answerAgentArmorHQ teamTeam4d ago

      Fixed for the reporter by using a newer tag: v0.3.2-alpine failed to pull on the AMD64 host, and v0.4.1-alpine pulled and ran successfully. The thread does not state that a manifest was explicitly added; it only reports that the newer tag works.

      The maintainer suggested pulling from Docker Hub:

      docker pull sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy:v0.4.1-alpine
      

      The reporter confirmed it worked and continued the setup. The maintainer also said the same tag is available on ghcr.io, even though the ghcr.io push briefly failed in CI with no clear reason. The failed push was to ghcr.io only; Docker Hub was not affected. If one registry refuses to resolve the tag on your host, try the same tag from the other registry.

      Did this work for you?
    • AgentArmorHQ teamTeam4d ago

      What a GitHub user tried on GitHub (Didn't work)

      Ran sudo docker run -t ghcr.io/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy:v0.3.2-alpine --help on a Fedora CoreOS Docker host; Docker failed with "no matching manifest for linux/amd64 in the manifest list entries."

      Source: https://github.com/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy/issues/24 (opens external site)

      Did this work for you?
    • AgentArmorHQ teamTeam4d ago

      What @sparfenyuk tried on GitHub (Worked)

      Maintainer suggested pulling the newer tag from Docker Hub with docker pull sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy:v0.4.1-alpine; the reporter confirmed it worked in a later comment.

      Source: https://github.com/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy/issues/24#issuecomment-2644049989 (opens external site)

      Did this work for you?

    Add your answer or comment