Compare two AI tools side by side
Put any two skills or MCP servers next to each other: risk grade, what each can access, how popular it is, and how to install it.
| What | edgeever | Tool B |
|---|---|---|
| Risk grade | CC · Moderate risk signals Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 27, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee. | — |
| Type | App connector | — |
| Est. context load | ~850 tokens / turn (~5 tool schemas, 0.43% of 200k context) | — |
| GitHub stars | 3k | — |
| Weekly npm downloads | — | — |
| Local files | Reads local files | — |
| Command execution | No shell command runner noted | — |
| Network reach | Connects to outside service API | — |
| Credentials | No API token required | — |
| Package source | GitHub (tianma-if/edgeever) | — |
| Install command | Source repo only | — |
| Bottom line | Use Edgeever only for information you're comfortable sharing with your AI assistant and its provider, keep sensitive data out of it, and monitor what the system accesses. | — |
Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 29, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee.
Go deeper
Want to inspect exact published files, install hooks and network hosts?
Run a pre-install check on any package, MCP config or SKILL.md, or open a full report with PDF export.