Compare two AI tools side by side
Put any two skills or MCP servers next to each other: risk grade, what each can access, how popular it is, and how to install it.
| What | nanoMuse | Tool B |
|---|---|---|
| Risk grade | CC · Moderate risk signals Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 21, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee. | — |
| Type | AI agent skill | — |
| Est. context load | ~113 tokens idle · ~450 tokens when active (on-demand skill) | — |
| GitHub stars | 2.9k | — |
| Weekly npm downloads | — | — |
| Local files | No local folder access noted | — |
| Command execution | No shell command runner noted | — |
| Network reach | Fetches arbitrary web URLs | — |
| Credentials | No API token required | — |
| Package source | GitHub (nano-muse/nanoMuse) | — |
| Install command | Source repo only | — |
| Bottom line | nanoMuse can access and control multiple devices, so limit its permissions carefully, monitor what it does, and understand that it makes decisions in the background. | — |
Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 29, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee.
Go deeper
Want to inspect exact published files, install hooks and network hosts?
Run a pre-install check on any package, MCP config or SKILL.md, or open a full report with PDF export.