Compare two AI tools side by side
Put any two skills or MCP servers next to each other: risk grade, what each can access, how popular it is, and how to install it.
| What | hol-guard | holaOS |
|---|---|---|
| Risk grade | CC · Moderate risk signals Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 26, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee. | BB · Some risk signals Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 16, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee. |
| Type | App connector | App connector |
| Est. context load | ~900 tokens / turn (~5 tool schemas, 0.45% of 200k context) | ~600 tokens / turn (~3 tool schemas, 0.3% of 200k context) |
| GitHub stars | 1k | 11.4k |
| Weekly npm downloads | — | — |
| Local files | No local folder access noted | Reads & writes local folders |
| Command execution | No shell command runner noted | No shell command runner noted |
| Network reach | Connects to outside service API | Fetches arbitrary web URLs |
| Credentials | Requires API key or token | Requires API key or token |
| Package source | GitHub (hashgraph-online/hol-guard) | GitHub (holaboss-ai/holaOS) |
| Install command | Source repo only | Source repo only |
| Bottom line | Hol-guard reduces risk but is not foolproof—treat it as one layer of defense, not complete protection against determined attacks or zero-day prompt injection techniques. | holaOS (MCP server) requires careful permission scoping — credentials & secrets scope: 100+ integrations mean broad credential management surface; ensure tight IAM policies and secret rotation for connected systems |
Based on public adoption and transparency signals as of Oct 29, 2026. Our opinion, not a code audit or security guarantee.
Go deeper
Want to inspect exact published files, install hooks and network hosts?
Run a pre-install check on any package, MCP config or SKILL.md, or open a full report with PDF export.